The following content is considered nonlegal and nonbinding OPINION only, and does not legally assume any entity is responsible for the accuracy of any facts that may seem to be presented by any entity. Rather this is meant to be a starting point of research into the facts or truth. The standard of the reasonable person should be assumed with regard to any possible research into the facts or truth!
Video conferencing, recording of all suspects conversations and allowing the media into the courtroom can help preserve evidence.
Logic tends to be the best evidence and the least difficult to fabricate.
Establishing a pattern of conduct or wrongdoing can help prove the evidence.
Showing consistence of wrongdoing can help properly build a case.
Reserving hidden interpretations of the evidence can help bring an element of surprise in a trial.
Government documents tend to be considered valid evidence.
Physical evidence tends to support other evidence.
Testimony even if true can be a problem because some seem nervous, or prejudice can exist towards a person giving testimony.
YOU MAY WISH TO EXPLAIN TO ALL THE WITNESSES THAT YOU WANT AFFIDAVITS TO THEM BECAUSE YOU WISH TO PRESENT THE CASE CONFORMING TO THE HIGHEST STANDARDS OF THE LAW AND TO HELP ENSURE THEIR SAFETY. YOU MAY ALSO DO THIS TO KEEP THEM FROM GETTING BOUGHT, SHIFTY, FRIGHTENED, TO REDUCE COSTS, TO TRY TO PREVENT THAT CASE FROM GOING TO TRIAL, TO MORE FULLY PREPARE YOUR CASE BEFORE TRIAL, TO BE MORE COMPREHENSIVE IN YOUR PRESENTATION AND TO PROTECT THE PUBLIC FROM FUTURE HARM.
EXPECT TO MEET STRICT STANDARDS in FEDERAL PRACTICE ABOUT WORD & PAGE COUNT, FONT, FILING, FILING ELECTRONICALLY (PDF), AND ESPECIALLY EVIDENCE! Life is about standards, and those who conform to higher standards are the most successful!
Continuity of evidence is usually needed.
Third party documentation may make evidence seem unbiased.
The best cases may not rely on human eye or ear witnesses.
Expert witnesses can seem unlikable and the best ones may be good at making things seem simple.
Experts need not be high-paid, but should be competent and friendly.
Key witnesses may make a case vulnerable to failure, if they are not so likeable, or if they fail to appear at the proceedings.
Key facts (ESPECIALLY SUSPRESSION OF OR DESTRUCTION OF OR MURDER OF WITNESSES WITHOUT THEIR AFFIDAVITS ALLEGING KEY FACTS) can also make a case vulnerable to failure, and it is often better to use many sources of information to cross check information in a case.
Evidence should likely be used in combination likely relying on the most powerful and indisputable evidence and it would be nice if cases did not need human testimony.
Actions tend to speak louder than words; consistent behavior is usually more important than consistent imagery; UNIQUE SKILLS, UNIQUE CRUMSTANCES, UNIQUE KNOWLEGDE OF OR SIMILAR MO (Modus Operandi) CAN MAKE CASE MORE LIKELY SEEM SOLVEABLE WITH THE SMALLEST CLUES PARTLY DUE TO A PROCESS OF ELIMINATION OF SUSPECTS.
Follow the unique evidence, logic and money to the top. Some say time reveals all, or the truth will set your free, or that truth is a defense, or that truth is the scientific standard. I AM SUGGESTING THAT THE TRUTH ALMOSTS ALWAYS WINS IN THE LONG RUN, EVEN WITH A PROBLEM JUDGE NOT ALLOWING CERTAIN EVIDENCE TO BE ADMITTED, WHICH MIGHT BE LEAKED TO THE MEDIA, WHICH A JURY MIGHT DISCOVER EVEN IF THEY ARE SEQUESTERED, LOCKED UP! We may think that almost always innocence or guilty will be revealed in time by some sort of evidence. MANY DID INFORMAL INTERVIEWS OF A VICTIM, YET FAILED TO PROPERLY REACT OR SEE THE MOST LOGICAL CONCLUSION WAS THE VICTIM WOULD BE MURDERED! ALL THE INFORMATION IS USUALLY THERE TO SOLVE A CRIME, BUT THE EVIDENCE IS OFTEN MISINTERPRETED FOR ALL THE WRONG REASONS!
THE TRUTH IS ALMOST ALWAYS DISCOVERED.