The following content is considered nonlegal and nonbinding OPINION only, and does not legally assume any entity is responsible for the accuracy of any facts that may seem to be presented by any entity. Rather this is meant to be a starting point of research into the facts or truth. The standard of the reasonable person should be assumed with regard to any possible research into the facts or truth!
Great investigators know how observe and interpret things.
No coincidences usually exist in an investigation.
Obstructed, nonexistent, or nonreported-crime or allegedly done by the poor, communists or children, often done against the wealthy or immigrants, or females or elderly.
Major Landlord, Railroad, renewable resource, or politically-protected industry, such as computer or Internet, with or without complications of Media, Military or Government, especially Politicians, or Independent bodies, especially non-profits entities, including religious, or inner circle of Legislative, Executive or Judicial Branch of Government(s).
Investigators state case(s) is to be handled in civil courts.
Use of code words to obscure crime.
Privacy, Unions, Academic Freedom, National security and/or Executive Orders make investigation or prosecution nearly impossible.
Group think, group vacations, group and/or Family, including multi- or inter-generation, controls law enforcement and many may retire in about 20 years or only stay in a department for about 5 years and after about 5 years on the job become almost impossible to terminate for good cause. Therefore, there is almost no continuity to investigations at least at local level. Estimates about corruption at local level can be in the range of 90% to 60% in some urban areas, especially with a corrupt foreign influence. Even at Federal or International level there may be an absense of talent and/or motivation.
Group controls media, think tank, government advisor position, and/or health, education, welfare or planning.
Government is overfunded at time of the crime and unwilling to prosecute.
Industry and/or competitors are overfunded and/or unpopular.
Near one industry region and/or cult-like region, which likely control dominant politically parties.
No accurate statistics or reporting of crime or media reporting of the incidents.
Suspect(s) may die, especially of addictions, have accident(s), or meet with foul play, especially from competitors or be expected to leave a region, and this can be some of the reason for lack of prosecution of crimes.
Foreign policy problem(s) could happen if the crime was revealed and/or prosecuted.
Contraband earning(s) could be supported by military and not authorized by the proper legal body.
Large scale technology, such as: Telecommunications, network, major communications, systems, especially power generation are corrupted.
Suspicious bombings, arsons, missing person(s), druggings, or loss of freedom.
Tip offs expected, unable to get Court Order, searches, seizures and/or wiretaps, with or without gag order.
Case is considered Federal or Major branch of government can control the investigation.
Huge fine(s) for crime would break industry considered too important to fail.
Copyright or patent type of crime, or pattern of crime that makes coverup necessary that could last over 40 years.
Considered open source or educational usage rather then theft.
Entity stolen from is considered EVIL and/or monopoly or TRUST and/or Combine.
Huge Civil Court history for case or related cases, and entity often wins cases that likely they shouldn't have won.
Considered experimentation, exploratory and/or without criminal intent or victimless crime, decriminalization of harmful conduct, or victims have memory problems, behavioral problems, need for privacy, wish to avoid stigmatization; and/or reclassification of criminal codes. Victims leave the region.
Profit motive of possible crime is obscured.
It is considered standard allowed practice, especially of an era or generation, especially against an entity (It has always happened that way. It is accepted!).
Unique or strategic activity which few possess the skills to understand.
Alleged competency deems suspect(s) too important to prosecute.
Suspicious organization has huge strange advertising, public relations expenses.
Suspect has made a public apology; or Deviant ads in personals, classified; or Tampered with records; or Tampered with witnesses, including illegal surveillance, manipulation, gifts, promises, intimidation, improper legal assistance, infiltration of noncriminal organizations; or Repeated decoys, planting of evidence, distractions, diversions, and/or attempts to falsely incriminate others; or Surreal, sacrificial quality to incidents around suspected criminal activity.
Crime seems inconsistent: immature and sophisticated: random and strategic; guilt ridden with attempts to make amends while escalating crime(s); encourages others to participate of copy crime(s); suspect military methods; huge investments in the crime or activity may be made by the suspect(s) with media, profits, investments, image at stake for many.
Investigators may have personal profit motive(s): book/movies deal(s), hired by companies the are to investigate, open their own agency, or to do their own web site. Even the prosecutors are often just passing through government positions for a short time to move on to civil law practices and even positions of judges and actually rarely acquire much competency. They tend to have little understanding of new criminal activity or the history of criminal enterprises. District Attorneys, State Attorney General, and US Attorney General positions tend to be political and for a short period of time. The top talent in the legal field often works corporate cases and not plaintiff or consumer law cases, and those firms then to be underfunded.
Media blackout when the first rapes where of 13 year-olds (did he follow them home from school, and should have parents been charged with criminal neglect?) This would be a failure to warn in my opinion, and this is likely done for the benefit of cops and to help maintain captives-FOR-ABUSE in an area!
Discouraged a resident patrol OR REWARD!
Had a Town Hall meeting!
GENERALLY, HELPED ENABLED AND IN A MANNER RECRUITED VICTIMS!
Didn't pattern match cases IN A TIMELY MANNER OR PROPERLY!
Seemed to think things of value WOULD BE HARMED OR TAKEN!
Did not seem to think either he was a copycat who also creates copycats!
DID NOT PROPERLY REALIZE AFTER THEY GOT A COMMUNICATION SUGGESTING CRIMES WOULD ESCALATE TO AN ALARMING DEGREE!
GENERALLY, HAD A FAILURE TO PROPERLY ANALYZE OR PRESERVE THE EVIDENCE!
MAY HAVE NOT SENT FINGERPRINTS TO EITHER THE FBI OR DMV?
DO NOT THINK HE WOULD BE OBVIOUS AND/OR THAT PERSONS WOULD DO COVERUPS!
DID NOT consider that THE PERPETRATOR chooses easy targets and/or areas where law enforcement is weak!
DID NOT PREVENT THE INTIMIDATION OF THE PUBLIC OR PERSONS WHO HAVE PREVIOUSLY BEEN THE VICTIMS OF THE TYPE OF CRIMES HE COMMITS.
UNDERESTIMATED THE PERPETRATOR'S IS ABILITY TO CHOOSE HIM VICTIMS CAREFULLY!
GENERALLY, UNDERESTIMATED THE PERPETRATOR'S ABILITIES!
GENERALLY DID NOT PROPERLY COORDINATE, PLAN OR CHOOSE THE PROPER TALENT TO WORK THE CASE!
Constantly tipped THE PERPETRATOR off so he/she/they would run to another jurisdiction and become someone else's problem!
Did not have A STRICT NON-CONFRONTATIONAL POLITY (a SURVEILLANCE AND CAPTURE POLICY WAS NOT USED).
DID not SEEM TO HAVE AN IDEA HOW TO ATTRACT THE PERPETRATOR OR FLUSH THE PERPETRATOR HIM OUT OF THE AREA!
Did not seem to know where THE PERPETRATOR would be, or why THE PERPETRATOR would be there, especially if THE PERPETRATOR had obvious places that he would be; THIS IS partly because they have NO INSIGHT OR MOTIVE TO PROPERLY PATROL OR POLICE AN AREA DUE TO ONLY WANTING TO WRITE TICKETS FOR SHORT TERM PROFIT!
THERE IS A POSSIBILIY THAT THIS HAS CAUSED THE PERPETRATOR TO STAKE OUT HIS/HER/THEIR TERRITORY AND EVEN ADVERTISE HIS/HER/THEIR PRESENSE NOW WITH BOMBS, GRAFFITI, AND/OR BY MAKING THERE IS A POSSIBILIY THAT THIS HAS CAUSED THE PERPETRATOR TO BECOME A POLITICAL/COMMERCIAL ENTITY!
ALL THE PERPETRATOR'S AND OTHER STATEMENTS MAY BE FALSE AND PURELY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE FOOL WHO LISTENS TO THEM IN AN ATTEMPT TO GET THE FOOL TO DO OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE OR CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION!
One of the best lines I feel in any movie about casework and investigations about investigator bias is from Double Indemnity (1944) "You know why you couldnít figure this one, Keyes? Iíll tell you. The guy you were looking for was too close. He was right across the desk from you." Follow the unique evidence, logic, behavior, and especially the money, usually to the top. MANY DID INFORMAL INTERVIEWS OF A VICTIM, YET FAILED TO PROPERLY REACT OR SEE THE MOST LOGICAL CONCLUSION WAS THE VICTIM WOULD BE MURDERED! The movie victims often do not want to come forward with information.! ALL THE INFORMATION IS USUALLY THERE TO SOLVE A CRIME, BUT THE EVIDENCE IS OFTEN MISINTERPRETED FOR ALL THE WRONG REASONS!
The cost of Investigation does not mean it has high value, or reflect its value.
Blanketing an area or possible targets may be necessary to draw out information because the victims may : 1) be unwilling to go public, but fear repetition of crime by either party; 2) Would like out of court settlement; 3) not make a police report; 4) have contacted someone to complain; 5) like an informal investigation or statistics keeping. 6) want to testify.